69 chevy said, "Military generators produce 400 cycle power. At least they did decades ago when I was in the Navy working on aircraft. Rationale was so civilians wouldn't steal 'em and use 'em."
Actually, 69 chevy, 400Hz power for aircraft originated because alternators, inverters, motors and transformers operating on 400 Hz power are inherently much smaller and lighter than the same function operating on 60 Hz power. Much less steel and copper required for the function, thus lots of weight saved with 400 Hz power and more payload can be carried. It's certainly true that 400 Hz aircraft equipment can't be used by "civilians" for home applications, but that was not at all the rationale for adopting 400 Hz for aircraft applications back in the early days of aviation.
rat4spd, you can get much more power out of small, light equipment built for 400 Hz than you can out of equipment built for 60 Hz, but 400 Hz power is inherently no "cleaner" than 60 Hz (or any other frequency) power and you still need the same voltage and current for a given function at either frequency - you just don't need as much iron and copper.
Sandy, your universal motor powered tools will operate at the same speed on 100 Hz or on 60 Hz because the speed of universal motors is NOT related to the power frequency. This is NOT the case with your ordinary induction motor used on most (but not all, these days) bench or floor-mounted power tools. Induction motors operate on totally different principles than universal motors. Induction motors are fundamentally rotary transformers in which the speed of the rotor is (almost) locked to the speed of "rotation" of the magnetic field created by the AC current passing through the stator windings.
The speed of rotation of the MAGNETIC FIELD of an induction motor is exactly related to the power frequency and the number of poles in the stator - 3600 RPM for a two-pole stator, 1800 RPM for a 4-pole stator, 1200 RPM for a 6-pole stator, and so on.
"Synchronous" motors (which you will rarely find on shop equipment) ARE exactly locked in to the speed of the rotating magnetic field. That's why they are used in clocks and timers and other equipment that requires exact speed. They do not rely on transformer action to excite a magnetic field in the rotor. Rather, they either have slip rings and windings on the rotor or the rotor has "salient poles" (poles that stick out) or magnetic characteristics that hold the magnetization of the rotor in a fixed position on the rotor. The fixed position of the magnetization of the rotor of a synchronous motor is what lockss the rotor to the exact rotating speed of the magnetic field of the stator.
Ordinary induction motors are NEVER locked at the exact speed of rotation of the magnetic field because they REQUIRE "slip," that is, the difference between synchronous speed and actual speed, to develop torque. The transformer action that induces circulating currents in the aluminum bars of the rotor, thus producing the magnetic field of the rotor, actually operates at the slip frequency, not the power frequency. Thus, no slip, no torque. An induction motor running at synchronous speed has zero torque. In fact, an induction motor driven at above synchronous speed develops negative torque - that is, requires application of torque to the rotor from an external source - and acts as a generator, driving electrical power back into the power grid. This is exactly what wind turbines do.
Sorry to have gotten carried away. Be careful about getting me started. (The capitalization is not yelling at you, it is to focus attention on specific words. I haven't yet learned how to italicize text in these posts.)
awright